Reviving Article 109: A Legal Path Out of Security Council Paralysis
Eighty-one years after Hiroshima, a look at the legal contradiction embedded in the UN’s founding—and the dormant charter provision that could still resolve it.
A Political History of the Internet
A review of Fiona M. Alexander, Laura DeNardis, Nanette S. Levinson, and Francesca Musiani, “Geopolitics at the Internet’s Core” (Palgrave MacMillan, 2025).
Data Theft Extortion Is Booming! Hooray!
The latest edition of the Seriously Risky Business cybersecurity newsletter, now on Lawfare.
Who Writes the AI Constitution?
Documents encoding AI models’ values are alignment’s highest-leverage point—regulating their contents hits the First Amendment.
.jpg?sfvrsn=7ae9135_5)
Exxon v. CIMEX and the Erosion of Foreign Sovereign Immunity
What Congress giveth, Congress can take away.
Closing the Front Door: The Case for DOJ’s Bulk Data Security Program
No one hacked us. Adversaries are buying U.S. troops’ location data on the open market. Privacy laws can’t stop them, but DOJ can.
Join the Lawfare Team
View Lawfare's open positions here.Keep Lawfare Paywall Free
Donate today!Highlights
-
Reviving Article 109: A Legal Path Out of Security Council Paralysis
Eighty-one years after Hiroshima, a look at the legal contradiction embedded in the UN’s founding—and the dormant charter provision that could still resolve it. -
A Political History of the Internet
A review of Fiona M. Alexander, Laura DeNardis, Nanette S. Levinson, and Francesca Musiani, “Geopolitics at the Internet’s Core” (Palgrave MacMillan, 2025). -
Data Theft Extortion Is Booming! Hooray!
The latest edition of the Seriously Risky Business cybersecurity newsletter, now on Lawfare. -
Who Writes the AI Constitution?
Documents encoding AI models’ values are alignment’s highest-leverage point—regulating their contents hits the First Amendment. -
Exxon v. CIMEX and the Erosion of Foreign Sovereign Immunity
What Congress giveth, Congress can take away. -
Closing the Front Door: The Case for DOJ’s Bulk Data Security Program
No one hacked us. Adversaries are buying U.S. troops’ location data on the open market. Privacy laws can’t stop them, but DOJ can. -
The FBI Proved Comey’s Innocence. The DOJ Indicted Anyway.
In the seashells case, the FBI searched for proof that gangsters used “86” to mean “kill” and that Comey knew it. Now an expert says their theory is “preposterous.” -
The Most Important Phrase in GSA’s Revised AI Clause Has No Definition
The revision fixed much of the first draft’s overreach, but the clause still doesn’t say where the government’s data protections begin and end. -
A Senate Committee Voted to Hold Fauci in Contempt. Now What?
The precedents set in the pursuit of Fauci could come back to haunt Republicans or possibly tee up even more politically motivated retribution campaigns in the next Congress. -
Pig-Butchering Scams and the Limits and Promise of Civil Forfeiture
The United States has increasingly used civil forfeiture to recover cryptocurrency stolen by transnational scam networks. The strategy has produced important seizures—but it remains structurally fragile ... -
From Promise to Peril: The U.S. Retreat From Civilian Harm Response
Hegseth’s U-turn on decades of CHMR progress has contributed to more civilian casualties and left victims without access to repair and amends. -
A Tale of Two Mogadishus
The Somali capital has had a calm year, but what does it actually mean? -
The Week That Was
Your weekly summary of everything on the site. -
Courts for AI Constitutions
AI labs already write constitutions for their models. What they lack is a court to interpret them. -
‘Defending Taiwan’ and the Limits of Military-Only Deterrence
A Review of Eyck Freymann’s “Defending Taiwan: A Strategy to Prevent War With China” (Oxford University Press, 2026)
_(53840300953).jpg?sfvrsn=67b3d42f_5)
.jpg?sfvrsn=a18facc6_4)
Featured Podcast
Live Coverage
For real-time updates of Lawfare’s coverage of the Trump administration’s legal challenges, follow on Bluesky or below:
What's Old Is New Again
With every new administration comes new promises and new actions on national security. But what’s “new” has often been proposed or even tried before—which means there’s a good chance Lawfare has already analyzed some of the legal and policy implications they present. So we’re making that past content readily accessible as it becomes newly relevant.
-
The Return of Schedule F
The Trump administration has proposed new rules to remove due process protections for thousands of federal employees. -
Donald Trump and the Department of Justice
On the loyalty of lawyers and the attitude of voters -
Trump’s Attacks on Justice Department Independence, Then and Now
What the first Trump administration carried out slowly, the new administration is doing at once.
Documents
-
White House Releases Executive Orders on Quantum Computing
-
White House Releases Executive Order on AI
-
Former Cuban President Raúl Castro Indicted
-
Trump Administration Releases 2026 Counterterrorism Strategy
-
Southern Poverty Law Center Indicted on Federal Fraud Charges
-
U.S. Government Agrees to $1.25 Million Settlement in Michael Flynn Suit
-
Trump Signs Executive Order Purporting to Restrict Mail-in Voting
-
ODNI Releases 2026 Threat Assessment
The Lawfare Podcast 
-
Scaling Laws: AI Consciousness with Anil Seth
-
Lawfare Daily: Purges and Power Plays in Domestic Ukrainian Politics
Unpack what's happened since Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky fired Defense Minister Mykhailo Fedorov. -
Lawfare Daily: Trump's New Plan for Gaza, with Joel Braunold
Why isn't Israel on board with the Trump administration's new plan for Gaza?
Other Lawfare Podcasts
Other Podcasts
Videos & Webinars
Lawfare Live: The Trials of the Trump Administration, August 14
Join the Lawfare team at 4 pm ET for a discussion of the litigation surrounding the Trump administration.
.jpg?sfvrsn=26ce5100_5)
.jpg?sfvrsn=3792d97a_5)
Explore
Congress
-
A Senate Committee Voted to Hold Fauci in Contempt. Now What?
-
Lawfare No Bull: Confirmation Hearing for Attorney General Nominee Todd Blanche
-
The Monroe Doctrine Was Never a Blank Check for Presidential War
-
Lawfare No Bull: Confirmation Hearing for Director of National Intelligence Nominee Jay Clayton
Armed Conflict
The Lawfare Institute:
Hard National Security Choices
Lawfare is a non-profit multimedia publication dedicated to “Hard National Security Choices.” We provide non-partisan, timely analysis of thorny legal and policy issues through our written, audio, and other content—all of which you can find here.
