Armed Conflict Criminal Justice & the Rule of Law Terrorism & Extremism

8/19 Motions Session #6: Bin Attash Health Matters

Raffaela Wakeman, Wells Bennett
Monday, August 19, 2013, 2:15 PM

A longer-than-usual lunch break concluded, the commission is reconvened. The accused are present, save Al-Hawsawi (who departed as per his announced plan) and bin Attash.  The latter reportedly is nearby, but feels quite ill, according to defense counsel Cheryl Bormann.  Thus he desires to be transported back to the detention facility to rest up, despite his wish to participate in the afternoon’s session.

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

A longer-than-usual lunch break concluded, the commission is reconvened. The accused are present, save Al-Hawsawi (who departed as per his announced plan) and bin Attash.  The latter reportedly is nearby, but feels quite ill, according to defense counsel Cheryl Bormann.  Thus he desires to be transported back to the detention facility to rest up, despite his wish to participate in the afternoon’s session.  (According to Bormann, her client has been diagnosed with some form of gastrointestinal problem; an unidentified mass under his sternum also has been identified.)  So where does that leave our agenda? And more importantly, is an excused absence for illness the same thing as a voluntary waiver of one’s presence rights?

Prosecutor Robert Swann says he wants Judge Pohl to question bin Attash prior to his return to the camp, in order to suss out his intentions and the severity of his health condition. Bormann herself has not spoken with bin Attash; as such, Judge Pohl suggests another short recess, during which she will speak with her client and then return him to the courtroom for a conversation, on the record, with the judge. For her part, Bormann prefers that any colloquy take place in closed session, for privacy reasons.

So is Walid Bin Attash too sick to participate? We’ll know soon enough.  Recess-time.


Raffaela Wakeman is a Senior Director at In-Q-Tel. She started her career at the Brookings Institution, where she spent five years conducting research on national security, election reform, and Congress. During this time she was also the Associate Editor of Lawfare. From there, Raffaela practiced law at the U.S. Department of Defense for four years, advising her clients on privacy and surveillance law, cybersecurity, and foreign liaison relationships. She departed DoD in 2019 to join the Majority Staff of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where she oversaw the Intelligence Community’s science and technology portfolios, cybersecurity, and surveillance activities. She left HPSCI in May 2021 to join IQT. Raffaela received her BS and MS in Political Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2009 and her law degree from Georgetown University Law Center in 2015, where she was recognized for her commitment to public service with the Joyce Chiang Memorial Award. While at the Department of Defense, she was the inaugural recipient of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s General Counsel Award for exhibiting the highest standards of leadership, professional conduct, and integrity.
Wells C. Bennett was Managing Editor of Lawfare and a Fellow in National Security Law at the Brookings Institution. Before coming to Brookings, he was an Associate at Arnold & Porter LLP.

Subscribe to Lawfare