-
Chatter: The Librarians Who Saved Books in World War II, with Kathy Peiss
Discussing the efforts of librarians to save books during World War II. -
Destroy, Rebuild, Repeat: Breaking the Climate-Disaster Cycle
As a climate-destabilized future approaches, U.S. laws, policies, and incentives are failing to account for this risk. -
The Supreme Court’s Presidential Immunity Decision
A summary of the Supreme Court opinions in Trump v. United States -
Lawfare Daily: Are Former Presidents Immune From Criminal Prosecution? We’re Still Not Sure
The Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Trump v. United States, concerning the former president’s potential immunity from prosecution over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. -
ChinaTalk: A National Vision for Competitiveness
-
Four Hearings and a Funding Stream
A dispatch from Judge Cannon’s hearings on special counsel funding, modifying Trump’s bond conditions, attorney-client privilege, and Trump’s challenges to the validity of the warrant. -
Livestream: Biden to Speak on Supreme Court's Presidential Immunity Ruling
President Joe Biden will deliver remarks on the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling in Trump v. United States. -
Summer 2024 Supplement for Bradley, Deeks, & Goldsmith, Foreign Relations Law: Cases and Materials
The supplement covers, among other things, foreign relations law issues implicated by U.S. actions. -
Lawfare Live: SCOTUS Rules on Presidential Immunity
Watch a live podcast recording on the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision. -
The Supreme Court Rules on Social Media First Amendment Cases
The Court decided that laws regulating social media platforms required a more comprehensive analysis of the facial challenges under the First Amendment, sending the cases back to the lower courts for fur... -
The Supreme Court Rules on Presidential Immunity
The Court ruled that presidents enjoy absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for “official acts” and sent Trump’s case back down for fact-finding. -
The Court’s Fischer Ruling Is a Symbolic Setback for the Justice Department—But One With Modest Consequences
The decision will dramatically impact only about 52 cases and, conceivably, not even those. It is unlikely to affect any charges against former President Trump. -
Lawfare Daily: Supreme Court Rules on Fischer v. United States
Discussing how SCOTUS's ruling impact hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants -
Understanding the State Department’s Latest Far-Right Terrorist Designation
The Nordic Resistance Movement has been listed as a foreign terrorist organization. Other groups should follow, but probably won’t. -
Lawfare Daily: Trump's Trials and Tribulations Weekly Round-up (June 27, 2024)
Listen to this week's episode of Trump's Trials and Tribulations -
National Security and Foreign Policy Highlights From the June 2024 Presidential Debate
The candidates discussed Jan. 6 and the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, among other topics. -
The Week That Was: All of Lawfare in One Post
Your weekly summary of everything on the site. -
Water Wars: Officials and Analysts Gather in Asia for Shangri-La, Tri-lats, and Quad-lats
Contrasting rhetoric at the Shangri-La Dialogue; collision in the Second Thomas Shoal; Quad coordination; and more. -
Lawfare Live: Discussing the Supreme Court's Fischer Decision
Join the Lawfare team today for a discussion of the Supreme Court's decision to weaken the use of an obstruction charge against Jan. 6 defendants -
Supreme Court Rules in Fischer v. U.S.
The court ruled in favor of a narrow interpretation of the obstruction statute that the Department of Justice has charged in at least 355 Jan. 6 related cases.
d53066db-7ced-48a6-bfb6-1af967d83015.png?sfvrsn=67273ffe_3)
.jpg?sfvrsn=e92dcb5d_5)
More Articles
-
The Week That Was
Your weekly summary of everything on the site. -
Advancing Secure by Design through Security Research
It is essential for U.S. policymakers to actively protect and promote the role of security research within an open and transparent ecosystem. -
A Reporter’s Notes of the April 23 Perkins Coie Hearing
Judge Howell appeared likely to permanently enjoin implementation of President Trump’s executive order targeting the law firm.
