6/19 Motions Session #3: Fits and Starts
Technical snags resolved---or, at least worked around temporarily---we return to J. Connell III’s examination of Admiral Woods.
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Technical snags resolved---or, at least worked around temporarily---we return to J. Connell III’s examination of Admiral Woods.
The lawyer asks about Woods’ revision memorandum, issued in light of the court’s bench instructions about privileged communications in the Al-Nashiri case. This described the procedures devised after the baseline review but before the issuance of a formal written communications order, Woods says. The witness’s SJA had some role in the drafting of the revision memorandum. Connell then recites the document’s definition of “privileged communications,” and, moments later, brings up an amicus brief Connell and company filed in Al-Nashiri.
But technical problems with the documents again arise, and preclude Woods from seeing the papers at his end of our virtual discussion. Without the court so declaring, we “recess in place”---pause and wait---while tech folks sort out the problem. After a while, the court, irritated, cautions that the proceedings cannot be delayed interminably; live testimony might be the way forward, if the VTC goofs cannot be addressed. So when will the matter be resolved? Answering, Prosecutor Edward Ryan says he will caucus with his colleagues about next steps.
We will learn about those steps after a brief recess.