Armed Conflict Criminal Justice & the Rule of Law Terrorism & Extremism

8/20 Motions Session #7: On Treatment of the Accused

Raffaela Wakeman, Wells Bennett
Tuesday, August 20, 2013, 3:52 PM

Harrington at the podium: after further discussion, the lawyer says he thinks that there are ongoing issues as between Binal Shibh and the guard force.  Harrington likely can deal with those.  If he can’t, the lawyer will raise any residual issues with the court.  But  as for today, Binal Shibh still wishes to depart.  Thus Judge Pohl marches through the advice of rights regarding the accused’s presence.  Binal Shibh understands his rights, and voluntarily and knowingly waives them---and the court so finds.

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

Harrington at the podium: after further discussion, the lawyer says he thinks that there are ongoing issues as between Binal Shibh and the guard force.  Harrington likely can deal with those.  If he can’t, the lawyer will raise any residual issues with the court.  But  as for today, Binal Shibh still wishes to depart.  Thus Judge Pohl marches through the advice of rights regarding the accused’s presence.  Binal Shibh understands his rights, and voluntarily and knowingly waives them---and the court so finds.  Alas, transporting the accused back to the detention camp means---you guessed it---a recess.  It ends quite quickly, allowing the parties to return to the afternoon’s business.

LCDR Kevin Bogucki, lawyer for Binal Shibh, stands and explains a bit more about his client’s departure.  A commission order, barring further interferences with Binal Shibh’s  activities (noises and shaking, among other things), has been ignored by JTF staff.  Contrast that with a recent camp visit by counsel for Al-Baluchi, wherein the JTF guards enforced the court’s instruction to the letter.  Why the disparity?  The former purported to restrain camp personnel; the latter purported to restrain defense counsel.  Bogucki thus wants an admonishment to JTF, that it must enforce all orders faithfully, even orders that impinge on JTF’s power.  The court squints: Judge Pohl distantly recalls that, at the time, no evidence pointed to harassment of Binal Shibh.  His order thus instructed the JTF not to engage in behavior that counsel had alleged---but not proved.  So what does Bogucki want now, additionally?  An order to the effect that Judge Pohl expects his orders to be relayed to the appropriate personnel, answers Bogucki. (The lawyer refers to several comments by camp staff---Task Force Platinum Commander, in particular---which suggested disrespect for the court’s directions.)

The Chief Prosecutor reminds the court that all the foregoing amounts to a proffer, not evidence, and thus doesn’t call for a decision from the court. His brief remarks then conclude, along with the afternoon’s Binal Shibh-related matters.

Raffaela Wakeman is a Senior Director at In-Q-Tel. She started her career at the Brookings Institution, where she spent five years conducting research on national security, election reform, and Congress. During this time she was also the Associate Editor of Lawfare. From there, Raffaela practiced law at the U.S. Department of Defense for four years, advising her clients on privacy and surveillance law, cybersecurity, and foreign liaison relationships. She departed DoD in 2019 to join the Majority Staff of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where she oversaw the Intelligence Community’s science and technology portfolios, cybersecurity, and surveillance activities. She left HPSCI in May 2021 to join IQT. Raffaela received her BS and MS in Political Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2009 and her law degree from Georgetown University Law Center in 2015, where she was recognized for her commitment to public service with the Joyce Chiang Memorial Award. While at the Department of Defense, she was the inaugural recipient of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s General Counsel Award for exhibiting the highest standards of leadership, professional conduct, and integrity.
Wells C. Bennett was Managing Editor of Lawfare and a Fellow in National Security Law at the Brookings Institution. Before coming to Brookings, he was an Associate at Arnold & Porter LLP.

Subscribe to Lawfare