Armed Conflict Courts & Litigation Criminal Justice & the Rule of Law Terrorism & Extremism

Almerfedi Public Merits Briefing Complete

Larkin Reynolds
Saturday, March 5, 2011, 9:16 AM
The public merits briefing in Almerfedi v. Obama (No.

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

The public merits briefing in Almerfedi v. Obama (No. 10-5291) is now complete.  The government filed its reply brief earlier this week, adding to the petitioner’s response brief and the government's opening brief. In its appeal, the government contests Judge Paul Friedman’s sole habeas merits opinion, in which he found the government had not proved that the petitioner was “part of” Al Qaeda. As we've previously written, the government urges the panel to find that the district court proceeded from principles of law that were later overturned by the D.C. Circuit in Al Adahi. It presents the following two questions for the court:
1. Whether the district court erred as a matter of law in failing to examine and take into account the mutually reinforcing nature of the evidence supporting the legitimacy of Almerfedi’s detention. 2. Whether the district court erred in failing to consider whether the petitioner’s implausible cover story was strong evidence supporting the denial of the writ.
Oral argument in this case is scheduled for April 11, 2011.

Larkin Reynolds is an associate at a D.C. law firm and was a legal fellow at Brookings from 2010 to 2011. Larkin holds a J.D. from Harvard Law School, where she served as a founding editor of the Harvard National Security Journal and interned with the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps, and the National Security Division of the Department of Justice. She also has a B.A. in international relations from New York University.

Subscribe to Lawfare