Bahlul Files Reply Brief
Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman Al Bahlul has filed his reply brief in his appeal of his military commission conviction in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. You'll recall that Al Bahul requested his appeal to be heard initially en banc, but that motion was denied.
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman Al Bahlul has filed his reply brief in his appeal of his military commission conviction in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. You'll recall that Al Bahul requested his appeal to be heard initially en banc, but that motion was denied. The government filed its respondent brief shortly thereafter. Bahlul makes three main arguments:
- The Government cannot Lawfully Divert the Prosecution of Domestic Crimes to a Law-of-War Commission Convened in Guantanamo Bay.
- The United States cannot put “the Thoughts, the Beliefs, the Ideals of the Accused” on Trial.
- The Government Offers No Rational, let alone Compelling, Reason to Allow Military Commissions to Deny Equal Justice under Law.
Oral argument is scheduled for September 10th before Circuit Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson, Judith Rogers, and David Tatel.