CA4: Accessing Cell Site Data Without a Warrant Violates Fourth Amendment

Wells Bennett
Wednesday, August 5, 2015, 2:52 PM

Earlier today, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit handed down its quite important decision in United States v. Graham.

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

Earlier today, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit handed down its quite important decision in United States v. Graham.

The gist of the two-judge majority opinion (penned by Senior Circuit Judge Andre Davis) is to hold, first, that accessing cell site data without a warrant violated the defendants' Fourth Amendment rights; but, second, that the violation did not require suppression, because it resulted from law enforcement's good faith reliance on procedures set forth by the Stored Communications Act.

The majority's ruling adds to a circuit split on the Fourth Amendment issue: It tracks a decision of the Third Circuit, but conflicts directly with judgments issued by the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits—the latter of which took up the question en banc and found no constitutional violation.


Wells C. Bennett was Managing Editor of Lawfare and a Fellow in National Security Law at the Brookings Institution. Before coming to Brookings, he was an Associate at Arnold & Porter LLP.

Subscribe to Lawfare