The Court of Military Commission Review Finally Begins to Move on the Hamdan and Al-Bahlul Appeals

Robert Chesney
Monday, January 24, 2011, 4:46 PM
The CMCR has at last ruled on the recusal and en banc issues that have, along with some personnel shuffling, been delaying a ruling in a pair of exceedingly important military commission cases (Hamdan and al-Bahlul).  Dwight Sullivan has the details, and links to the opinions here at CAAFLOG.  Suffice to say that there were two recusals and that the remainder of the full CMCR will take these cases en banc. I've posted
Meet The Authors

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

Subscribe to Lawfare
The CMCR has at last ruled on the recusal and en banc issues that have, along with some personnel shuffling, been delaying a ruling in a pair of exceedingly important military commission cases (Hamdan and al-Bahlul).  Dwight Sullivan has the details, and links to the opinions here at CAAFLOG.  Suffice to say that there were two recusals and that the remainder of the full CMCR will take these cases en banc. I've posted repeatedly on why the CMCR needs to move with all possible speed on this front, and won't repeat those arguments here.  Today's orders say nothing of whether there will be a new round of briefing or oral argument.
Back to Top
Robert Chesney

Robert Chesney

@bobbychesney
Read More
Robert (Bobby) Chesney is the Dean of the University of Texas School of Law, where he also holds the James A. Baker III Chair in the Rule of Law and World Affairs at UT. He is known internationally for his scholarship relating both to cybersecurity and national security. He is a co-founder of Lawfare, the nation’s leading online source for analysis of national security legal issues, and he co-hosts the popular show The National Security Law Podcast.
}

Subscribe to Lawfare