Court Will Hear Argument from Media and ACLU During 9/11 Case's Next Session

Wells Bennett
Thursday, August 2, 2012, 11:35 AM
That's the word from James Connell III, an attorney for 9/11 defendant Ammar al Baluchi, a.k.a. Ali Abdul Aziz Ali.  The lawyer's statement is below the fold.
Today, the military commission released an order stating that it will hear oral argument from the ACLU and a coalition of 14 media organizations at the upcoming hearing in the 9/11 case. The military commission stated that it will permit the ACLU and media coalition to argue their positions on August 22 at a time to be determined. Pentagon-detailed defense attorneys welcomed today’s ruling.

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

That's the word from James Connell III, an attorney for 9/11 defendant Ammar al Baluchi, a.k.a. Ali Abdul Aziz Ali.  The lawyer's statement is below the fold.
Today, the military commission released an order stating that it will hear oral argument from the ACLU and a coalition of 14 media organizations at the upcoming hearing in the 9/11 case. The military commission stated that it will permit the ACLU and media coalition to argue their positions on August 22 at a time to be determined. Pentagon-detailed defense attorneys welcomed today’s ruling. “Oral argument from the media and ACLU will emphasize the critical public interest in open proceedings at Guantanamo,” said James Connell, attorney for accused logistical co-conspirator Ammar al Baluchi, also known as Ali Abdul Aziz Ali. The argument over access to testimony by the defendants is just one of the issues relating to classified evidence expected to be heard later this month. Other issues include presumptive classification—the Guantanamo rule that all prisoner statements are considered classified—and the prosecution’s attempt to invoke classified information privilege using documents it refuses to provide to the defense.

Wells C. Bennett was Managing Editor of Lawfare and a Fellow in National Security Law at the Brookings Institution. Before coming to Brookings, he was an Associate at Arnold & Porter LLP.

Subscribe to Lawfare