Armed Conflict Courts & Litigation Criminal Justice & the Rule of Law Terrorism & Extremism

The DC Circuit Decision in Khan and the Question of "Associated Forces"

Robert Chesney
Tuesday, September 6, 2011, 2:06 PM
Further to Ben's post on the new DC Circuit decision in Khan v.

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

Further to Ben's post on the new DC Circuit decision in Khan v. Obama, I want to draw attention to the brief discussion at the end of the opinion addressing the fact that Khan was said to be associated not with al Qaeda or the Taliban but with Gulbuddin Hekmatyar's Hezb-e-Islami organization.  Worth noting: the panel expressed no doubt about the proposition that detention authority extends beyond al Qaeda and the Taliban to at least some "associated forces," focusing only on the question of whether the district court properly had found Hezb-e-Islami to be such a force.  That question wasn't (and shouldn't be) a close call, as Hezb-e-Islami is among the many groups that engage in attacks on coalition forces in Afghanistan.

Robert (Bobby) Chesney is the Dean of the University of Texas School of Law, where he also holds the James A. Baker III Chair in the Rule of Law and World Affairs at UT. He is known internationally for his scholarship relating both to cybersecurity and national security. He is a co-founder of Lawfare, the nation’s leading online source for analysis of national security legal issues, and he co-hosts the popular show The National Security Law Podcast.

Subscribe to Lawfare