Armed Conflict Courts & Litigation Criminal Justice & the Rule of Law Terrorism & Extremism

D.C. Circuit Rules in <em>Obaydullah</em>

Benjamin Wittes
Saturday, August 11, 2012, 7:46 AM
Here's the opinion--from a panel consisting of Judges Merrick Garland and Karen LeCraft Henderson and Chief Judge David Sentelle. The opinion denying Obaydullah's Guantanamo habeas appeal is a per curiam, though Judge Sentelle dissents on grounds that the court lacks jurisdiction over the case because of untimely filings.

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

Here's the opinion--from a panel consisting of Judges Merrick Garland and Karen LeCraft Henderson and Chief Judge David Sentelle. The opinion denying Obaydullah's Guantanamo habeas appeal is a per curiam, though Judge Sentelle dissents on grounds that the court lacks jurisdiction over the case because of untimely filings. For those who need a refresher, here is our oral argument preview on the case. I have only read the case briefly, but there doesn't seem to be anything particularly new or surprising in it. Then again, based on D.C. Circuit precedent, it wasn't a tough case on its merits.

Benjamin Wittes is editor in chief of Lawfare and a Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. He is the author of several books.

Subscribe to Lawfare