Armed Conflict Intelligence

DOJ Announces Full Criminal Investigation Into Deaths of Two Detainees In Relation to CIA Interrogation

Robert Chesney
Thursday, June 30, 2011, 2:51 PM
A dramatic announcement just now from the Justice Department, concerning the outcome of the Durham Investigation into CIA interrogation practices.  It is unclear from the context whether that investigation continues with respect to the destruction of interrogation videotapes, though the statement below might be read to suggest that the matter has been closed without concluding that further investigation is warranted.  But  {UPDATE: Of course that aspect of the investigation closed last year.

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

A dramatic announcement just now from the Justice Department, concerning the outcome of the Durham Investigation into CIA interrogation practices.  It is unclear from the context whether that investigation continues with respect to the destruction of interrogation videotapes, though the statement below might be read to suggest that the matter has been closed without concluding that further investigation is warranted.  But  {UPDATE: Of course that aspect of the investigation closed last year. UPDATE #2: A reader suggests that there may yet be some issues that remain open as to the tape-destruction matters; suffice to say that it's not clear on the outside what the situation is]  As to the component of the investigation relating to the possible use of unauthorized interrogation techniques, the Attorney General has announced the following:
WASHINGTON – The Attorney General made the following statement today: “On January 2, 2008, Attorney General Michael Mukasey appointed Assistant United States Attorney John Durham of the District of Connecticut to conduct a criminal investigation into the destruction of interrogation videotapes by the Central Intelligence Agency.  On August 24, 2009, based on information the Department received pertaining to alleged CIA mistreatment of detainees, I announced that I had expanded Mr. Durham’s mandate to conduct a preliminary review into whether federal laws were violated in connection with the interrogation of specific detainees at overseas locations.  I made clear at that time that the Department would not prosecute anyone who acted in good faith and within the scope of the legal guidance given by the Office of Legal Counsel regarding the interrogation of detainees.  Accordingly, Mr. Durham’s review examined primarily whether any unauthorized interrogation techniques were used by CIA interrogators, and if so, whether such techniques could constitute violations of the torture statute or any other applicable statute. “In carrying out his mandate, Mr. Durham examined any possible CIA involvement with the interrogation of 101 detainees who were in United States custody subsequent to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, a number of whom were determined by Mr. Durham to have never been in CIA custody.  He identified the matters to include within his review by examining various sources including the Office of Professional Responsibility’s report regarding the Office of Legal Counsel memoranda related to enhanced interrogation techniques, the 2004 CIA Inspector General’s report on enhanced interrogations, additional matters investigated by the CIA Office of Inspector General, the February 2007 International Committee of the Red Cross Report on the Treatment of Fourteen “High Value Detainees” in CIA Custody, and public source information. “Mr. Durham and his team reviewed a tremendous volume of information pertaining to the detainees.  That review included both information and matters that had never previously been examined by the Department.  Mr. Durham has advised me of the results of his investigation, and I have accepted his recommendation to conduct a full criminal investigation regarding the death in custody of two individuals.  Those investigations are ongoing.  The Department has determined that an expanded criminal investigation of the remaining matters is not warranted. “As I noted at the time I announced the expansion of Mr. Durham’s authority, the men and women in our intelligence community perform an incredibly important service to our nation, and they often do so under difficult and dangerous circumstances.  They deserve our respect and gratitude for the work they do.  However, I concluded based on information available to me then, and continue to believe now, that the Department needed to thoroughly examine the detainee treatment issue.  I am confident that Mr. Durham’s thorough review has satisfied that need.”

Robert (Bobby) Chesney is the Dean of the University of Texas School of Law, where he also holds the James A. Baker III Chair in the Rule of Law and World Affairs at UT. He is known internationally for his scholarship relating both to cybersecurity and national security. He is a co-founder of Lawfare, the nation’s leading online source for analysis of national security legal issues, and he co-hosts the popular show The National Security Law Podcast.

Subscribe to Lawfare