Armed Conflict Foreign Relations & International Law

ICC Prosecutors: No Jurisdiction for Proposed Gaza Investigation

Robert Chesney
Tuesday, April 3, 2012, 10:28 AM
Prosecutors at the ICC have determined that they lack jurisdiction to investigate crimes allegedly committed in Gaza, reasoning that Palestine does not constitute a "state" for purposes of Article 12 of the Rome Statute and hence cannot confer jurisdiction on the ICC (leaving only the option of a UN Security Council referral, which of course has not happened in this instance).  The two-page explanation from the Office of the Prosecutor offers the following account:

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

Prosecutors at the ICC have determined that they lack jurisdiction to investigate crimes allegedly committed in Gaza, reasoning that Palestine does not constitute a "state" for purposes of Article 12 of the Rome Statute and hence cannot confer jurisdiction on the ICC (leaving only the option of a UN Security Council referral, which of course has not happened in this instance).  The two-page explanation from the Office of the Prosecutor offers the following account:
competence for determining the term “State” within the meaning of article 12 rests, in the first instance, with the United Nations Secretary General who, in case of doubt, will defer to the guidance of General Assembly. The Assembly of States Parties of the Rome Statute could also in due course decide to address the matter in accordance with article 112(2)(g) of the Statute. In interpreting and applying article 12 of the Rome Statute, the Office has assessed that it is for the relevant bodies at the United Nations or the Assembly of States Parties to make the legal determination whether Palestine qualifies as a State for the purpose of acceding to the Rome Statute and thereby enabling the exercise of jurisdiction by the Court under article 12(1). The Rome Statute provides no authority for the Office of the Prosecutor to adopt a method to define the term “State” under article 12(3) which would be at variance with that established for the purpose of article 12(1). The Office has been informed that Palestine has been recognised as a State in bilateral relations by more than 130 governments and by certain international organisations, including United Nation bodies. However, the current status granted to Palestine by the United Nations General Assembly is that of “observer”, not as a “Non‐member State”. The Office understands that on 23 September 2011, Palestine submitted an application for admission to the United Nations as a Member State in accordance with article 4(2) of the United Nations Charter, but the Security Council has not yet made a recommendation in this regard. While this process has no direct link with the declaration lodged by Palestine, it informs the current legal status of Palestine for the interpretation and application of article 12. The Office could in the future consider allegations of crimes committed in Palestine, should competent organs of the United Nations or eventually the Assembly of States Parties resolve the legal issue relevant to an assessment of article 12 or should the Security Council, in accordance with article 13(b), make a referral providing jurisdiction.

Robert (Bobby) Chesney is the Dean of the University of Texas School of Law, where he also holds the James A. Baker III Chair in the Rule of Law and World Affairs at UT. He is known internationally for his scholarship relating both to cybersecurity and national security. He is a co-founder of Lawfare, the nation’s leading online source for analysis of national security legal issues, and he co-hosts the popular show The National Security Law Podcast.

Subscribe to Lawfare