Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

Today's Washington Post contains an article by David Ignatius that reports on the DoD's "third offset" strategy. As the Post describes it, the idea broadly speaking is to use "the latest tools of artificial intelligence and machine learning to create robot weapons, 'human-machine teams' and enhanced, super-powered soldiers." Some of the specifics include "advanced navigation for smart weapons using micro-cameras and sensors; missile-defense systems using hypervelocity projectiles; and swarming drones that are 'really fast, really resistant.'"

All of that is well and good. It would, indeed, be useful if DoD developed these capabilities in defense of American interests. But from the outsider's perspective, I wonder two things:

I fully support taking advantage of America's technological advantage. I just hope we are able to maintain it.


Paul Rosenzweig is the founder of Red Branch Consulting PLLC, a homeland security consulting company and a Senior Advisor to The Chertoff Group. Mr. Rosenzweig formerly served as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy in the Department of Homeland Security. He is a Professorial Lecturer in Law at George Washington University, a Senior Fellow in the Tech, Law & Security program at American University, and a Board Member of the Journal of National Security Law and Policy.

Subscribe to Lawfare