June 11 Session #6: On Recording 802 Conferences
Lunch recess comes to a close and the commission is again called to order. Before moving to our next docket item, Kammen identifies his pending expert requests. Then he registers another complaint about attorney-client meetings: another of the defense’s lawyers tried to meet with Al-Nashiri this week, but GTMO personnel said he could not bring a briefcase.
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Lunch recess comes to a close and the commission is again called to order. Before moving to our next docket item, Kammen identifies his pending expert requests. Then he registers another complaint about attorney-client meetings: another of the defense’s lawyers tried to meet with Al-Nashiri this week, but GTMO personnel said he could not bring a briefcase.
Now under discussion is AE148: the defense wants 802 conferences---informal, administrative chats regarding logistics and courtroom process---to be recorded, and made a part of the official record. The court cuts this one to the quick: he has discretion to order this relief, and will do so as appropriate---though not across-the-board. Thus the motion is denied in part and granted in part, in that Judge Pohl will call for recording when necessary.
That was easy. Will the next motion---one at the very heart of the military commissions’ nature, in Kammen’s words---be so easy?