Criminal Justice & the Rule of Law

Refugee EO: Hawaii’s Response to the Government’s Request for a Stay

Peter Margulies
Wednesday, July 19, 2017, 8:08 AM

Yesterday, Hawaii posted a response to the government’s request to the Supreme Court to stay Hawaii District Court Judge Derrick Watson’s injunction regarding President Trump’s Refugee Executive Order (EO). The response argues that Judge Watson was right to hold that the Supreme Court’s “bona fide relationship” standard included U.S.

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

Yesterday, Hawaii posted a response to the government’s request to the Supreme Court to stay Hawaii District Court Judge Derrick Watson’s injunction regarding President Trump’s Refugee Executive Order (EO). The response argues that Judge Watson was right to hold that the Supreme Court’s “bona fide relationship” standard included U.S. relatives such as grandparents, grandchildren, uncles, aunts, nieces, and nephews, as well as refugee agency assurances on resettling refugees in the U.S. (For analysis of the refugee and relatives issues, see my earlier post here.)


Peter Margulies is a professor at Roger Williams University School of Law, where he teaches Immigration Law, National Security Law and Professional Responsibility. He is the author of Law’s Detour: Justice Displaced in the Bush Administration (New York: NYU Press, 2010).

Subscribe to Lawfare