Senators Leahy and Cornyn on CIA's Proposed E-Mail Destruction Policy
Senators Patrick Leahy and John Cornyn yesterday joined other Senators in expressing concern over a CIA proposal regarding the destruction of agency E-mail.
Their letter to the National Archives and Records Administration ("NARA")---which evaluates federal bureaucracies' records preservation policies---says, in pertinent part:
We write to express concern about a recent proposal to allow the destruction
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Senators Patrick Leahy and John Cornyn yesterday joined other Senators in expressing concern over a CIA proposal regarding the destruction of agency E-mail.
Their letter to the National Archives and Records Administration ("NARA")---which evaluates federal bureaucracies' records preservation policies---says, in pertinent part:
We write to express concern about a recent proposal to allow the destruction of the emails of most Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) employees three years after they leave CIA employment, “or when no longer needed, whichever is sooner.” We understand that this policy would apply to all CIA employees except the 22 most senior officials of the agency. Transparency and accountability are critical to a functioning democracy. We have worked together for years to improve the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) with the goal of making our government more open and transparent. We are concerned that this policy would undermine the ability of citizens to understand how their government works and hold it accountable. In an era when critically important government activities and decisions are conducted via email, a plan to delete the majority of emails at any agency should raise great concern. Due to the nature of the CIA’s work, it is particularly important to evaluate carefully any changes to CIA recordkeeping policies. Many CIA activities are not declassified for years or even decades. Therefore, historians and other researchers, who rely on FOIA requests to learn about CIA programs and understand how the CIA’s activities fit into the larger picture of U.S. foreign affairs, may not have any basis to make FOIA requests until decades after the activities at issue occurred. That is all the more reason why it is so important to maintain a permanent, full accounting of CIA activities. We also know that CIA personnel have in some instances deliberately destroyed records or other materials, suggesting that the National Archives must be particularly cautious in approving any policy permitting permanent destruction of CIA records. Further, this new policy could undermine congressional oversight efforts, as pointed out by the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in their letter dated November 17, 2014. We urge you to take these considerations into account as you consider whether to approve the new retention schedule for CIA employee email. To lose permanent access to the email of every CIA employee, except the 22 most senior officials at the agency, is to lose access to a piece of American history. Thank you for your consideration.Missives along these lines seemingly have had an effect already. A little more than a week ago, a senior NARA official responded to a similar letter, penned by Senators Ron Wyden, Mark Udall and Martin Heinrich. Chief Records Officer Paul Wester told the three that NARA planned to "reassess" CIA's proposal.
Wells C. Bennett was Managing Editor of Lawfare and a Fellow in National Security Law at the Brookings Institution. Before coming to Brookings, he was an Associate at Arnold & Porter LLP.