Criminal Justice & the Rule of Law Foreign Relations & International Law

Supreme Court Rules in Bank Markazi v. Peterson: Congress Did Not Exceed its Power and Victims Can Collect

Yishai Schwartz
Wednesday, April 20, 2016, 5:55 PM

Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Bank Markazi v. Peterson, a case we previewed last year when the Court first asked for the opinion of the Solicitor General during the certiorari process. In this case, the Iranian Central Bank appealed from a judgment allowing terror victims access to complexly held assets connected with the U.S. banking system.

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Bank Markazi v. Peterson, a case we previewed last year when the Court first asked for the opinion of the Solicitor General during the certiorari process. In this case, the Iranian Central Bank appealed from a judgment allowing terror victims access to complexly held assets connected with the U.S. banking system. The Iranian Central Bank suggested that a special law passed to ensure victims' access to these assets violated separation of powers. Today, the Supreme Court rejected the Bank's appeal by a vote of 6-2. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the majority, and the Chief Justice (joined by Justice Sotomayor) dissented. You can find the opinions here. Analysis on Lawfare will follow shortly.


Yishai Schwartz is a third-year student at Yale Law School. Previously, he was an associate editor at Lawfare and a reporter-researcher for The New Republic. He holds a BA from Yale in philosophy and religious studies.

Subscribe to Lawfare