Today's Headlines and Commentary
The news cycle over the past day has been dominated by the release of the extensive report on CIA intelligence-gathering techniques, popularly known as the “torture report” or the “CIA report.” The New York Times writes that the review portrays a broken CIA that was devoted to a failed interrogation program.
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
The news cycle over the past day has been dominated by the release of the extensive report on CIA intelligence-gathering techniques, popularly known as the “torture report” or the “CIA report.” The New York Times writes that the review portrays a broken CIA that was devoted to a failed interrogation program. NBC News reports that the CIA paid “torture teachers” over $80 million to develop and operate the “enhanced interrogation techniques.” According to Vox, the Senate report proves “once and for all” that the use of enhanced interrogation techniques did not lead to the capture of Osama bin Laden. The New York Times has its own piece on that latter point, too.
The Times also claims that, according to the report, the CIA used media leaks to its advantage by shaping public discourse and opinion over the EITs. The Washington Post outlines some of the more gruesome techniques interrogators employed, including rectal rehydration and feeding. NBC News takes a look into how the CIA tried to “break” prisoners in its ultra-secret “Salt Pit” detention center in Afghanistan. The Los Angeles Times notes that according to the report, the CIA struggled to continuously rationalize the brutal interrogations. Also, the Boston Globe repeats a report allegation that former President Bush was “kept in the dark” on certain CIA tactics.
The Hill carries President Obama’s response to the report, wherein he states that torture is “contrary to our values.” The Washington Post features more on his comments and the report here. The Post also has CIA Director John Brennan’s rebuttal to the study. RollCall covers Senator McCain’s reaction to the report and his “unique moral perspective” on the question of torture.
Politico outlines what is not in the report. The New York Times notes that the release of the study has prompted calls, both domestically and abroad, for prosecution of CIA agents involved. However, those hoping for trials shouldn’t hold their breath, says Bloomberg View. According to them, there are more than a few reasons why the CIA is not likely to be punished.
In addition to their coverage, the Washington Post also has a timeline of important dates regarding the report. US News features the numbers behind the CIA interrogation report. For those interested in knowing more about the 54 countries that aided the CIA’s detention and interrogation program in some way, Vox provides a map. Also, the Washington Post collated the 10 “most harrowing” excerpts from the report.
If you want to know what the CIA actually did, Time explains. And, for an oldie, check out this piece in the Post that examines five myths about torture.
For more related coverage, here is a handy list:
- “The Torture Report: Inhumane Scenes from the CIA’s Prisons” (by Amy Davidson, appears in the New Yorker)
- “Shock and Anal Probe: Reading Between the Redactions in the CIA Torture Report” (by David Iglesias, Steven Hawkins, Vincent Iacopino, Tony Camerino, Marcy Wheeler, John Sifton and Katherine Hawkins, appears in the Guardian)
- “Meet the Psychologists Who Helped the CIA Torture” (by Jesse Singal, appears in NY Magazine)
- “Ten Key Passages from the Report on the CIA’s Interrogation and Detention Program” (by Matt Stiles and Stuart Thompson, appears in the Wall Street Journal)
- “Twenty Key Findings About CIA Interrogations” (by Katie Park and Laris Karklis, appears in the Washington Post)
- “Michael Hayden is Not Sorry” (by Michael Hirsh, appears in Politico)
- “World Media React to CIA Torture Report” (by Jane Onyanga-Omara, appears in USA Today)
- “CIA Torture Report: Global Reaction Roundup” (by Matthew Weaver, appears in the Guardian)
- “The Senate Report on the CIA’s Torture and Lies” (by the Editorial Board, appears in the New York Times)
- “The Horrors in America’s ‘Dungeon’ Should Never Have Happened” (by the Editorial Board, appears in the Washington Post)
- “Spooks of the Senate” (by the Editorial Board, appears in the Wall Street Journal)
- “Interrogations Saved Lives” (by Ex-CIA Directors, appears in the Wall Street Journal)
- “The Senate’s CIA Report is a Necessary Public Accounting” (by David Ignatius, appears in the Washington Post)
- “Releasing the Feinstein Report is an Act of Exceptional Recklessness” (by Michael Gerson, appears in the Washington Post)
- “We’re Always Still Americans” (by Thomas Friedman, appears in the New York Times)
- “The Feinstein Report Cannot Deny a Clear Record of Success” (by John Yoo, appears in Time)
- “Taking Responsibility for Torture” (by David Cole, appears in the New Yorker)
- “‘The Case for Rage and Retribution’” (by Jeffrey Goldberg, appears in the Atlantic)
- “Coming Clean, with Bloodstained Hands” (by David Rothkopf, appears in Foreign Policy)
- “CIA Torture Stained Nation’s Honor” (by Sen. John McCain, nationally syndicated)
- “Dianne Feinstein Defends the Torture Report” (By Sen. Dianne Feinstein, appears in the Los Angeles Times)
- “Partisan Torture Report Fails America” (by Sen. Bob Kerrey, appears in USA Today)
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare
Ben Wittes provided an overview of what to expect from Lawfare as we review the SSCI report on CIA Enhanced Interrogation Techniques. The Lawfare staff curated the primary documents from the SSCI study, including the full report, Minority and CIA responses. Ben Wittes also provided video reactions from various senators. Wells Bennett, Cody Poplin, and Ben Bissell have began to review the findings, conclusions and areas of dispute between the SSCI study, the Minority, and the CIA. You can find Part 1 here and Part 2 here. Paul Rosenzweig introduced a new series on the Lawfare Bitcoin. Make sure to follow along in this experiment. Ben Wittes linked us to the text of Secretary Kerry’s opening statement and the video of his full testimony yesterday in front of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Email the Roundup Team noteworthy law and security-related articles to include, and follow us on Twitter and Facebook for additional commentary on these issues. Sign up to receive Lawfare in your inbox. Visit our Events Calendar to learn about upcoming national security events, and check out relevant job openings on our Job Board.
Ben Bissell is an analyst at a geopolitical risk consultancy and a Masters student at the London School of Economics. He graduated Phi Beta Kappa from the University of Virginia with majors in political science and Russian in 2013. He is a former National Security Intern at the Brookings Institution as well as a Henry Luce Scholar, where he was placed at the Population Research Institute in Shanghai, China.