Armed Conflict Courts & Litigation Criminal Justice & the Rule of Law Terrorism & Extremism

Two New Supreme Court Habeas Filings

Larkin Reynolds
Wednesday, March 30, 2011, 10:38 AM
On Monday, counsel for the habeas petitioners Farhi Saeed Bin Mohammed and Omar Khadr replied to the government's oppositions to their cert. petitions. The Khadr reply is short, and the Mohammed reply even shorter.

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

On Monday, counsel for the habeas petitioners Farhi Saeed Bin Mohammed and Omar Khadr replied to the government's oppositions to their cert. petitions. The Khadr reply is short, and the Mohammed reply even shorter. In fact, the Mohammed reply, which came after the government transferred Mohammed from Guantanamo Bay to Algeria, concedes that the transfer rendered the petition itself moot. It states that the petitioner would be filing a Rule 46 dismissal motion (also filed Monday) and asks the Court to reference arguments made in the original Mohammed petition in considering whether to grant cert. in Khadr (the Mohammed and Khadr petitions share a question presented). UPDATE: Mohammed petition. Khadr petition.

Larkin Reynolds is an associate at a D.C. law firm and was a legal fellow at Brookings from 2010 to 2011. Larkin holds a J.D. from Harvard Law School, where she served as a founding editor of the Harvard National Security Journal and interned with the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps, and the National Security Division of the Department of Justice. She also has a B.A. in international relations from New York University.

Subscribe to Lawfare