Congress
Criminal Justice & the Rule of Law
Cybersecurity & Tech
Executive Branch
Intelligence
Surveillance & Privacy
Two Quite Important Rulings Today
Coincidentally, they come to us from two different federal judges in the District of Oregon.
The first decision concludes that remedial mechanisms associated with the so-called "No Fly" list violate due process; the second rejects a defendant's post-conviction effort to have an indictment thrown out---and, among other things, in doing so also rejects a constitutional attack on Section 702 of FISA.
Have a look at the quite significant opinions in Latif v.
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Coincidentally, they come to us from two different federal judges in the District of Oregon.
The first decision concludes that remedial mechanisms associated with the so-called "No Fly" list violate due process; the second rejects a defendant's post-conviction effort to have an indictment thrown out---and, among other things, in doing so also rejects a constitutional attack on Section 702 of FISA.
Have a look at the quite significant opinions in Latif v. Holder and United States v. Mohamud.
Wells C. Bennett was Managing Editor of Lawfare and a Fellow in National Security Law at the Brookings Institution. Before coming to Brookings, he was an Associate at Arnold & Porter LLP.
-final.png?sfvrsn=b70826ae_3)
