William Marra and Sonia McNeil on Regulating the Next Generation of Drones
Recent Harvard Law School grads William Marra and Sonia McNeil--authors of the first Lawfare Research Paper--have released a short Brookings briefing paper on the regulation of future drones in domestic airspace. Entitled "Understanding 'The Loop': Regulating the Next Generation of Drones," it opens as follows:
Drones have revolutionized warfare.
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Recent Harvard Law School grads William Marra and Sonia McNeil--authors of the first Lawfare Research Paper--have released a short Brookings briefing paper on the regulation of future drones in domestic airspace. Entitled "Understanding 'The Loop': Regulating the Next Generation of Drones," it opens as follows:
Drones have revolutionized warfare. They may soon transform civilian life, too. These machines are already patrolling the U.S.–Mexican border and assisting with other law enforcement efforts. And Congress has voted to further expand the use of drones at home, directing the Federal Aviation Administration to unshackle restrictions on domestic drones by 2015. As amazing as today’s aerial drones may seem, they are merely the “Model T” of robot technology. Most are souped-up remote-controlled airplanes, still with a human pilot, though he or she now sits at a military base rather than in the cockpit. Today’s drones do not think, decide, and act on their own. In engineering speak, they are merely “automated.” Tomorrow’s drones are expected to leap from automation to “autonomy.” Those highly sophisticated machines will have the ability to undertake missions with little or no guidance from a human operator. The difficult policy questions raised by today’s automated drones will seem pedestrian compared to the issues created by tomorrow’s technologies. Today, humans are still very much “in the loop.” Humans generally decide when to launch a drone, where it should fly, and whether it should take action against a suspect. But as drones develop greater autonomy, humans will increasingly be “out of the loop.” Human operators will not be necessary to decide when a drone (or perhaps a swarm of microscopic drones) takes off, where it goes, and how it acts. Regulations for today’s airborne drones should be crafted with an eye toward tomorrow’s technologies. Policymakers must better understand how the next generation of autonomous systems will look compared to today’s merely automated machines. As we show in this paper, language useful to the policymaking process has already been developed in the same places as drones themselves — research and engineering laboratories across the country and around the globe. We introduce this vocabulary here to explain how tomorrow’s drones will differ and to suggest possible approaches to regulation. Autonomy is no longer solely a feature of humans. Whether it is a desirable quality for machines will be among the most important policy questions of the coming years.
Benjamin Wittes is editor in chief of Lawfare and a Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution. He is the author of several books.