Your Friday Afternoon FISC 215 Document Dump
Now available: a six-strong batch of
}
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Now available: a six-strong batch of historical materials regarding a telecommunications provider's January 2014 petition to vacate or modify an order issued pursuant to Section 215. I've only thumbed through the documents, which include the provider's petition, the Justice Department's response, and four orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ("FISC").
On first blush, it looks like a phone company (we don't know which, thanks to redactions) subject to a 215 order had challenged the order early this year, before the FISC, on Fourth Amendment grounds. The petitioner there essentially relied upon Judge Richard Leon's ruling, in the Klayman case, that the NSA's call bulk call records program ran contrary to the Fourth Amendment.
The gist: in March, the FISC seemingly rejected the company's Fourth Amendment claim, but afterwards ordered the release of documents made available today---having in mind the declassification by the executive branch of details surrounding collection of telephony metadata.
Wells C. Bennett was Managing Editor of Lawfare and a Fellow in National Security Law at the Brookings Institution. Before coming to Brookings, he was an Associate at Arnold & Porter LLP.
More Articles
-
House Passes Section 702 Reauthorization
The House narrowly rejected a warrant requirement in a bill that reauthorizes FISA Section 702 for two years. -
Senate Unveils “Compromise” FISA Reauthorization Bill
The modified warrant requirement resembles but doesn’t fully embrace a compromise foreshadowed by PCLOB last year. -
The Year That Was (2023)
The issues—and Lawfare coverage—that kept our editors up at night in 2023.