Foreign Relations & International Law

Cybersecurity and the International Telecommunication Union

Paul Rosenzweig
Tuesday, November 20, 2012, 9:18 AM
As close readers of Lawfare will be aware (but many others will not) the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) will be meeting next month in Dubai.  The ITU, a relative backwater of the UN, has long had ministerial responsibilities for telecommunications law (things like setting frequencies and assigning country codes).  In recent months, however, the ITU, with strong backing from non-Western states has begun efforts to assert a role in managing the Internet -- a role currently filled by NGOs.  Some see this move as beneficial -- the internationalization of Internet governance.  Others (

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

As close readers of Lawfare will be aware (but many others will not) the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) will be meeting next month in Dubai.  The ITU, a relative backwater of the UN, has long had ministerial responsibilities for telecommunications law (things like setting frequencies and assigning country codes).  In recent months, however, the ITU, with strong backing from non-Western states has begun efforts to assert a role in managing the Internet -- a role currently filled by NGOs.  Some see this move as beneficial -- the internationalization of Internet governance.  Others (me included) are more skeptical of given the UN a role in managing the Internet. I'll have more to say on the subject in the coming weeks, but I wanted to start the discussion by calling your attention to a new paper by the Center for Democracy and Technology, whose title gives some indication of its conclusions: Security Proposals to the ITU Could Create More Problems, Not Solutions  From the Introduction:
Member States of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) are considering this year whether to extend the ITUʼs regulatory authority to the Internet. Several proposals have been made to revise the ITUʼs basic treaty to include provisions addressing the security of networks or information. These proposals have rightly raised controversy not only because of their implications for Internet freedom, but also because of concerns that ITU intervention could distract from or undermine other ongoing efforts by institutions better suited to address Internet security.
The entire paper is well worth reading.

Paul Rosenzweig is the founder of Red Branch Consulting PLLC, a homeland security consulting company and a Senior Advisor to The Chertoff Group. Mr. Rosenzweig formerly served as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy in the Department of Homeland Security. He is a Professorial Lecturer in Law at George Washington University, a Senior Fellow in the Tech, Law & Security program at American University, and a Board Member of the Journal of National Security Law and Policy.

Subscribe to Lawfare