In defense of our “grossly irresponsible talk.”

Threats against public officials have been steadily rising for some time. Saturday was the sad crescendo to a disturbing trendline.

Chief Justice Roberts gives neither Trump nor any future president a green light to tyranny, as some initial reactions to his opinion fear.

The upcoming release of the Palestine Advisory Opinion may raise significant questions about how the International Court of Justice establishes the facts on which an alleged breach of the law is made.

The countries that the United States is trying to rally together are too dispersed to share the same security concerns.

Your weekly summary of everything on the site.

Both cases found the justices split on whether to separate the president from the presidency.

Overturning the law on First Amendment grounds would require courts to make policy judgments that should be left to the political branches.

The majority opinion in Trump v. United States badly misstates principles of separation of powers to immunize hypothetical future presidents—in service of immunity for Trump himself.

Missing in much commentary about Trump v. United States is what it means for the expansion of immunities for presidents while in office.