-
Your weekly summary of everything on the site.
-
The Court botched the legal reasoning and relied heavily on dubious policy arguments.
-
Two mothers, two journalists, a lawyer, and a stepfather recently stood trial in Paris for charges related to the financing of terrorism. They argued they were trying to save lives.
-
The latest edition of the Seriously Risky Business cybersecurity newsletter, now on Lawfare.
-
President Biden called for a commitment to freedom and democracy at home and overseas.
-
Do retired generals think they should speak out on political issues? Most favor restraint—but how much and when is up for debate.
-
What is surveillance capitalism?
-
What a reasonable compromise on U.S. person queries–one that accommodates legitimate arguments of each side–looks like.
-
Contrary to suggestions during the NetChoice oral arguments, Section 230 does not require platforms to be “neutral."
-
This week, Tyler McBrien joined Alan Rozenshtein, Quinta Jurecic, and Scott Anderson to discuss the week's big national security news, including:
-
-
On Sept. 27, Washington and Lee University School of Law’s Frances Lewis Law Center, Georgetown Law’s Center on National Security, and Steptoe LLP will host a roundtable on “National Security & Internati...