Latest in Highlights
Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With 
-
Livestream: Attorney General Merrick B. Garland to Make a Statement
-
Texas Responds to Justice Department’s Suit in Floating Border Wall Case
In the brief, Gov. Greg Abbott invokes the “invasion clause” of the U.S. constitution, among other statutory arguments. -
The 2024 NDAA, Data Brokers, and Members of Congress
Members of Congress want their information removed from data brokers’ databases—but not that of their constituents. -
The Lawfare Podcast: Does Trump Have to Attend His Own Trials?
It's more complicated than one would originally assume. -
The Next Frontier in AI Regulation Is Procedure
From “Who enforces?” to “How are disputes adjudicated?” prosaic procedural questions may make the difference between regulatory impact and irrelevance. -
The Bulwark Podcast: Trump Baits the Judge
Benjamin Wittes joins Charlie Sykes for this week's episode of "The Trump Trials." -
Rational Security: The “Dog Days” Edition
This week, Alan, Quinta, and Scott beat back the heat to dig into the week's big national security news stories. -
Chatter: Covering the Justice Department During and After Trump, with Katie Benner
Benjamin Wittes talks to Kate Benner about her experience covering the Justice Department and how it has changed. -
Will the New EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework Pass CJEU Scrutiny?
Changes to U.S. surveillance safeguards will test the practical limits of the EU court’s abstract principles. -
The Lawfare Podcast: Can We Build a Trustworthy Future Web?
What are the challenges to scaling trust and safety to new information ecosystems? -
Trump Responds to Government's Proposed Protective Order in MAL Case
Donald Trump requests the ability to review evidence that includes classified material in locations other than the designated SCIFs. -
Twitter Fined $350,000, Failed to Comply with Trump Search Warrant
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed a district court decision to hold Twitter in contempt and impose a $350,000 fine.
Topics
