Latest in Highlights
Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With 
-
Uncertainty, Catastrophic Risk, and AI Regulation
The future risks of AI are uncertain and hard to quantify, but that doesn’t mean policymakers shouldn’t address them now. -
TechTank: What do Vance and Walz have to say about tech policy?
-
ChinaTalk: R&D Renaissance with Kumar Garg
-
Lawfare Daily: Gharun Lacy Talks State Department Cybersecurity
Discussing the Diplomatic Security Service's cybersecurity work. -
Trump Can’t Withdraw From NATO, but He Could “Quiet Quit”
Not participating in NATO would undermine the alliance—and U.S. foreign policy -
Lawfare Daily: National Security and the 2024 Election, Armed Conflict
-
The Week That Was
Your weekly summary of everything on the site. -
Egypt’s Dystopian Criminal Procedure Code
Egypt is considering a new law that threatens to destroy due process protections, with implications well beyond political cases. -
The Three I's In Spyware
The latest edition of the Seriously Risky Business cybersecurity newsletter, now on Lawfare. -
The Cyber Resilience Act, an Accidental European Alien Torts Statute?
The CRA has introduced a novel, and potentially quite worrying, approach to cybersecurity legislation. -
Lawfare Daily: Helen Toner and Zach Arnold on a Common Agenda for AI Doomers and AI Ethicists
Discussing the divide between AI doomers and ethicists. -
How the Insurrection Act (Properly Understood) Limits Domestic Deployments of the U.S. Military
While legislative reforms would be helpful, a strong case can be made that the existing language of the act should be read narrowly, for both constitutional and practical reasons.
Topics
