Your weekly summary of everything on the site.

Both cases found the justices split on whether to separate the president from the presidency.

Overturning the law on First Amendment grounds would require courts to make policy judgments that should be left to the political branches.

The majority opinion in Trump v. United States badly misstates principles of separation of powers to immunize hypothetical future presidents—in service of immunity for Trump himself.

Missing in much commentary about Trump v. United States is what it means for the expansion of immunities for presidents while in office.

Bigger is better approaches in AI create an inexhaustible appetite for users’ data, leading to a rise in user data expropriation, sectioning off of the internet, and “data feudalism.”