Other Capitol Insurrection Documents
Table of Contents
California
John Eastman
- Notice of disciplinary charges against John Eastman brought by the State Bar of California (Jan. 26, 2023)
- On Jan. 26, 2023, the California bar announced disciplinary charges against Eastman for his role in efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Authorities sought Eastman's disbarment.
- Recommendation by the California State Bar Court that Eastman be disbarred (March 27, 2024)
- Ruling on the disciplinary charges against Eastman, the State Bar Court recommended his disbarment. Eastman has announced that he will appeal the decision.
District of Columbia
Jeffrey Clark
Specification of Charges (July 19, 2023)
Clark’s Motion for Extension of Time to File his Response to the Charges (Aug. 4, 2022)
Disciplinary Counsel’s Opposition to Clark’s Motion for Extension of Time (Aug. 4, 2022)
Clark’s Motion to File Reply to Motion for Extension Under Seal (Aug. 5, 2022)
Clark’s Motion to Place his Motion for Extension Under Seal (Aug. 5, 2022)
Board on Professional Responsibility’s Order Granting Clark’s Motion to File Response Under Seal (Aug. 8, 2022)
Hearing Committee Grants Clark’s Motion for Extension for Filing Response to Charges (Aug. 8, 2022)
Clark’s Motion to Recuse Board Member Matthew Kaiser (Aug. 11, 2022)
Sealed Response to the Board’s Aug. 8 Order Sealing Order Including a Call for Affirmative Relief (Aug. 11, 2022)
Clark’s Request for Deferral (Aug. 29, 2022)
Disciplinary Counsel’s Opposition to Request for Deferral (Aug. 31, 2022)
Clark’s Answer to the Charges (Sept. 1, 2022)
Clark’s Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (Sept. 1, 2022)
Clark’s Motion to File Answer to Charges Under Seal (Sept. 1, 2022)
Clark’s Motion to File Motion to Dismiss Under Seal (Sept. 1, 2022)
Board on Professional Responsibilty’s Order Denying Clark’s Motion to File Under Seal (Sept. 2, 2023)
Disciplinary Counsel’s Omnibus Response to Clark’s Sept. 1 Pleadings (Sept. 6, 2022)
Opposition to Respondent’s Sealed Response to the Board’s Aug. 8 Sealing Order (Sept. 6, 2022)
Hearing Committee Chair’s Recommendation to Deny Clark’s Request for Deferral (Sept. 12, 2022)
Clark’s Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss (Sept. 12, 2022)
Order Denying Clark’s Motion to Recuse Board Member Matthew Kaiser (Sept. 16, 2022)
Pre-Hearing Transcript (Oct. 16, 2022)
Hearing Committee Order Requesting Status Updates (June 16, 2023)
Disciplinary Counsel’s Status Report (June 23, 2023)
Clark’s Status Report (June 23, 2023)
Clark’s Motion to Vacate Orders (July 9, 2023)
Disciplinary Counsel’s Opposition to Clark’s Motion to Vacate Orders (July 11, 2023)
Clark’s Reply in Support of Motion to Vacate Orders (July 11, 2023)
Clark’s Motion to Disregard ODC Affidavit as Legally Deficient and Thus Irrelevant (July 13, 2023)
Hearing Committee Order to Defer Resolution of Clark’s Motion to Vacate Pending Determination of Jurisdiction (July 28, 2023)
Rudy Giuliani
Specification of charges (June, 6, 2022)
Giuliani’s response to charges (July 13, 2022)
Disciplinary Counsel’s Pre-Hearing Memo (Oct. 13, 2022)
Giuliani’s Motion to Disqualify Matthew Sanderson as an Expert Witness (Oct. 21, 2022)
Disciplinary Counsel’s Objections to Giuliani’s Expert Witnesses (Oct. 25, 2022)
Response to Disciplinary Counsel’s Objections to Witness John Droz, Jr. (Oct. 31, 2022)
Pre-hearing Conference Transcript (Nov. 9, 2022)
Denial of Motion to Disqualify Matthew Sanderson as a Witness (Nov. 10, 2022)
Amended Specification of Charges (Nov. 17, 2022)
Hearing Transcript (Dec. 5, 2022)
Hearing Transcript (Dec. 6, 2022)
Hearing Transcript (Dec. 7, 2022)
Hearing Transcript (Dec. 8, 2022)
Legal Arguments on behalf of Giuliani (Dec. 8, 2022)
Disciplinary Counsel's Response to Giuliani’s Legal Arguments and Statement (Dec. 12, 2022)
Hearing Transcript (Dec. 15, 2022)
Disciplinary Counsel’s Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations as to Sanction (Jan. 30, 2023)
Giuliani’s Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendations as to Sanction (March 1, 2023)
Disciplinary Counsel’s Reply Brief to Giuliani’s Response (March 16, 2023)
Report and Recommendation of Ad Hoc Hearing Committee (July 7, 2023)
Giuliani Notice of Wish to File Objections to Recommendations of Committee (July 13, 2023)
Scheduling of Oral Arguments Announcement (July 20, 2023)
D.C. Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility's report and recommendation that Giuliani be disbarred (May 31, 2024)
New York
Rudy Giuliani
- Order disbarring Giuliani (July 2, 2024)
Inspectors general in multiple federal agencies have launched investigations in connection with the Jan. 6 insurrection. Below are reports from some of these investigations
Defense Department
- Department of Defense Inspector General Report (Nov. 18, 2021)
Department of Homeland Security
- DHS IG Report: Intelligence division failed to share information about known violent threats in advance of Jan. 6 (March 4, 2022)
- The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General found that three different divisions with in the Office of Intelligence and Analysis failed to share with state, local, and federal partners important information about threats of violence on January 6. In multiple instances, I&A analysts collected open-source information about threats but did not issue reports. I&A did email information about potential threats to local Washington, D.C. partners, but this information "was not as widely disseminated as I&A's typical intelligence products." The Report concluded that the failure resulted from a number of factors, including inexperienced analysts, inadequate training, and hesitancy to report. It made five recommendations for rectifying the root causes, all of which DHS has adopted.
- Letter to the House and Senate Homeland Security committees reporting that the U.S. Secret Service erased text messages sent and received on Jan. 5 and Jan. 6, 2021. (July 14, 2022)
- On July 13, 2022, the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General sent a letter to the House Committee on Homeland Security and the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs reporting that the U.S. Secret Service had deleted text messages from Jan. 5 and Jan. 6, 2021. In the letter, the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General wrote that the Secret Service deleted the text messages after the Office of the Inspector General requested access to the agency’s electronic communications.
U.S. Capitol Police
- United States Capitol Police Office of the Inspector General Review of the Events Surrounding the January 6, 2021 Takeover of the U.S. Capitol Flash Report: Hazardous Incident Response Division and Canine Unit Executive Summary
- United States Capitol Police Office of the Inspector General Review of the Events Surrounding the January 6, 2021 Takeover of the U.S. Capitol Flash Report: Command and Coordination Bureau Executive Summary
- U.S. Capitol Police Office of the Inspector General Review of the Events Surrounding the January 6, 2021, Takeover of the U.S. Capitol: Flash Report, Containment Emergency Response Team and First Responders Unit Executive Summary
- U.S. Capitol Police Office of the Inspector General Review of the Events Surrounding the January 6, 2021, Takeover of the U.S. Capitol: Flash Report, Civil Disturbance Unit and Intelligence Executive Summary (April 2021)
- U.S. Capitol Police Office of the Inspector General Review of the Events Surrounding the January 6, 2021, Takeover of the U.S. Capitol: Flash Report, Civil Disturbance Unit and Intelligence (March 2021)
- U.S. Capitol Police Office of the Inspector General Review of the Events Surrounding the January 6, 2021, Takeover of the U.S. Capitol: Flash Report, Operational Planning and Intelligence (Febuary 2021)
U.S. Government Accountability Office
- GAO Report: Actions Needed to Prepare the Capitol Police for Violent Demostrations (March 2022)
- The Government Accountability Office (GAO) was asked to review a number of issues relating to the January 6, 2021 Capitol Attack, including the preparation and performance of the Capitol Police on the day of the attack, as well as what changes were necessary to prevent a future attack. On March 7, 2022, GAO released its fourth report, which summarizes its findings and recommendations after a survey of Capitol Police officers who had been working the day of the January 6, 2021 Capitol Attack.
Other Reports
- Report of U.S. Army Operations on January 6, 2021 (March 18, 2021)
- This report, written by the Department of the Army, details the Army's claims about its conduct and that of the D.C. National Guard on Jan. 6. Some of the material has been alleged by current and former Guard officials to be false.
Recent Lawfare Coverage
-
Lawfare Daily: 64 Days: A New Documentary Film About Jan. 6, with Director Nick Quested
What new information is in "64 Days?" -
Trump’s D.C. Criminal Case Lurches Back to Life
A dispatch from Judge Chutkan’s courtroom for a status hearing in United States v. Trump. -
The Supreme Court’s Presidential Immunity Decision
A summary of the Supreme Court opinions in Trump v. United States -
Lawfare Daily: Are Former Presidents Immune From Criminal Prosecution? We’re Still Not Sure
The Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Trump v. United States, concerning the former president’s potential immunity from prosecution over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. -
The Court’s Fischer Ruling Is a Symbolic Setback for the Justice Department—But One With Modest Consequences
The decision will dramatically impact only about 52 cases and, conceivably, not even those. It is unlikely to affect any charges against former President Trump. -
Lawfare Daily: Supreme Court Rules on Fischer v. United States
Discussing how SCOTUS's ruling impact hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants -
Lawfare Live: Discussing the Supreme Court's Fischer Decision
Join the Lawfare team today for a discussion of the Supreme Court's decision to weaken the use of an obstruction charge against Jan. 6 defendants -
The End of ‘The Aftermath’
Season 2 of our narrative series on Jan. 6 has come to a close. But the search for accountability is far from over. -
‘For the Ages’: The Supreme Court Hears the Presidential Immunity Defense
How oral argument in Trump v. United States zoomed way out, and where the Court may go from here.