As the pandemic goes on, lawsuits in federal courts have proliferated across the country challenging the inadequate response of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to the spread of the coronavirus.

Strategic messages that incorporate credible threats under jus ad bellum are often the best option to enhance deterrence signaling.

Most governments consider tear gas a weapon of war yet routinely use it against their own populations during periods of internal unrest. The history is complicated.

The president has a legal obligation to file a report with Congress on legal authorities connected to ongoing U.S. military operations. He has shirked that duty.

The better approach for the U.S. is to use the lexicon of jus ad bellum in public messaging.

The Cyber Solarium Commission’s new white paper explores what the coronavirus can teach us about how to prepare for a major cyber attack. But it also highlights cybersecurity principles that would have b...

The administration’s floundering response to the pandemic, along with its efforts to limit oversight through existing mechanisms, provides ample evidence of the need for a congressional probe.

If Joe Biden wins the November election, Americans will likely see a reversion to a more traditional approach to the presidency. What might that mean in the field of U.S. national security?

While President Trump can decide whether to use force against Iran, Congress has taken steps that may make him unwilling to do so.

The FBI and CISA are worried about intellectual property theft of coronavirus vaccines and treatments. But to develop cures quickly, the scientific community needs to think cooperatively.

If Congress is serious about bending the curve, it shouldn’t allow people to opt out of effective disease-surveillance programs.

Russia initially seemed largely unscathed by the pandemic. But the virus has since arrived in full force. How has the country responded?