-
Can Congress Disqualify Trump After the Supreme Court’s Section 3 Ruling?
The dueling opinions for the 9-0 decision support two opposing interpretations on this crucial question. -
The Lawfare Podcast: Six Counts Quashed in the Fulton County Case
Why did Judge McAfee dismiss six counts of the electoral interference indictment? -
Lawfare Live: Trump's Trials and Tribulations, March 14
Join the Lawfare team for a discussion of the trials of Donald Trump -
Lawfare Live: Discussing the Dismissal of 6 Counts in the Fulton County Indictment
Benjamin Wittes, Anna Bower, and Anthony Michael Kreis will discuss the order in a live recording of the Lawfare Podcast. -
A Noteworthy Omission in the Texas Border Litigation
Texas is a party to several international agreements on illegal immigration, but the Justice Department has declined to challenge them. Why? -
Location Data Broker X-Mode and the FTC’s Unprecedented Settlement
The FTC reached an unprecedented settlement with location data broker X-Mode. Here’s what to know. -
Interpreting the Key Misdemeanor Charge in Jan. 6 Cases
Disagreement over the elements of federal trespassing law produces divergent outcomes in Jan. 6 cases, sets the stakes for U.S. Court of Appeals battle. -
“Once again, not guilty, your honor”: Menendez Supersedingly Arraigned in Federal Court
A dispatch from the courtroom of U.S. District Judge Sidney H. Stein. -
Trump Seeks Adjournment in NY Criminal Case, Cites Presidential Immunity
Trump is requesting that the trial in New York be adjourned pending the Supreme Court’s review of the scope of presidential immunity doctrine. -
The Lawfare Podcast: Unpacking the Supreme Court’s Fourteenth Amendment Ruling
What are the implications of the recent SCOTUS ruling on Section 3? -
The Lawfare Podcast, Trump’s Trials and Tribulations: Pending Motions Piling Up in Florida
Listen to this week's episode of Trump's Trials and Tribulations -
What the Supreme Court Got Wrong in the Trump Section 3 Case
The Court botched the legal reasoning and relied heavily on dubious policy arguments.