-
DC Circuit Court Upholds but Narrows FOSTA
The court found that the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act is not overbroad or unconstitutionally vague. -
The Lawfare Podcast: But Her Emails!
Does former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago conduct bear any resemblance to the conduct of Hillary Clinton regarding her emails? -
Rational Security: The “BANG! POW! SPARKLE!” Edition
This week, Alan, Quinta, and Scott sat down to talk over the week's post-Independence Day national security news. -
District Court Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in Missouri v. Biden
Judge Terry A. Doughty restricted parts of the federal government from communicating with social media companies. -
The Lawfare Podcast: The Legal Arguments Behind Mike Pence’s January 6 Grand Jury Testimony
What does former Vice President Mike Pence's testimony to a federal grand jury mean for the special counsel's investigation into Jan. 6? -
Moore v. Harper Explained
The Supreme Court largely rejected the independent state legislature theory, concluding that state courts can review regulations on federal elections. -
Don’t Write Off the Southern District of Florida in the Trump Prosecution
The Southern District of Florida is a district where high-profile cases involving classified information have been successfully prosecuted. -
Rational Security: The 'Mutiny in the Kitchen' Edition
This week, Alan, Quinta, and Scott were joined by their colleague and think-tank neighbor, Russia/Ukraine expert Eric Ciaramella, to talk over the week's big news. -
The Arraignment That Wasn’t
The former president’s “body man” wasn’t arraigned—for a second time. Why? -
703 Ways Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Conduct Bears No Resemblance to Hillary Clinton’s Emails
Insisting on similarity is a kind of lie to make Clinton’s conduct look worse than it was, to make Trump’s look more benign than it was, or both at the same time. -
Chatter: Covering the January 6th Trials with Roger Parloff
-
Confusing Judicial Reform With Unleashing Extremism
The debate over judicial activism is the wrong lens through which to consider the current Israeli fight over its judiciary. The right lens is the restraint of authoritarianism and religious radicalism.