-
Workshop Report: The Transatlantic Dialogue on Military Cyber Operations-Amsterdam
The Strauss Center at UT-Austin has published a report summarizing the dialogue at the “Transatlantic Dialogue on Military Cyber Operations,” which occurred in Amsterdam in August 2019. -
New Reporting Offers a Glimpse Inside China’s Xinjiang Practices, Renewing Calls for a U.S. Response
Lawfare’s biweekly roundup of U.S.-China technology policy news. -
Two Massachusetts Men Charged with Cybercrimes
-
Russian Credit Card Fraud Suspect Finally Appears in U.S. Federal Court
-
No, Facebook and Google Are Not State Actors
Jed Rubenfeld is incorrect; the Good Samaritan provision of Section 230 does not turn internet platforms into First Amendment state actors. -
If Facebook and Google Are State Actors, What’s Next for Content Moderation?
The pivotal question, doctrinally, turns out to be what kind of First Amendment forums Google and Facebook operate. -
U.S. Launches National Security Probe Into Chinese-Owned App TikTok
Lawfare’s biweekly roundup of U.S.-China technology policy news. -
India’s Role in Global Cyber Policy Formulation
India should have a significant role to play in the global debate on cyber policy. Where exactly does it stand on the issues and how can it ensure it has a seat at the global table? -
Trade-Offs in the Design of Facebook’s Oversight Board: No Silver Bullet
An overview of the research and analysis used by Facebook in developing the company’s new oversight mechanism. -
The WhatsApp-NSO Group Lawsuit and the Limits of Lawful Hacking
A recent lawsuit by WhatsApp against a spyware company may signal the beginning of the end for lawful hacking as a solution to the problem of law enforcement access to encrypted data. -
A Thoughtful Response to Going Dark and the Child Pornography Issue
Rep. Anna Eshoo and Sen. Ron Wyden have written a thoughtful letter calling on law enforcement to employ currently available digital investigative capabilities. -
Are Facebook and Google State Actors?
If Congress had done in almost any other setting what it’s done to online speech, the unconstitutionality would have been immediately apparent.