-
Rational Security: The “Donny with the Gold Hair” Edition
This week, Alan, Quinta, and Scott were joined by Fulton County correspondent Anna Bower to talk through the week’s big news down south. -
The Lawfare Podcast: Anna Bower on What Happened in Coffee County
How did a team end up taking election system data—in broad daylight—despite it being computer intrusion and theft? -
Three Questions About Section 241, the Conspiracy Against Rights Statute
A short primer on the Trump Jan. 6 indictment’s most surprising statute -
The Lawfare Podcast: Explaining the Michigan Fake Electors Prosecution
Why did Michigan become a center of conspiracy theories during the 2020 election? -
The Fulton County Indictment: An Initial Examination
The document is unlike anything else pending against Trump in the scope of its allegations of criminality. -
Meadows Files Notice of Removal After Georgia Indictment
Meadows asserts that the conduct that the Georgia indictment alleges was unlawful was simply “part of his service as Chief of Staff.” -
The Lawfare Podcast, Emergency Edition: Trump Indicted in Fulton County, Georgia
What is in the fourth Trump indictment? -
What the Heck Happened in Coffee County, Georgia?
A detailed look back at the computer intrusion that features prominently in Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s election interference indictment -
Donald Trump Indicted in Fulton County
Former President Donald Trump and his advisors face charges for alleged criminal activity undertaken in the state of Georgia as a part of efforts to overturn the outcome of the 2020 presidential electi... -
More on How to Think About the Costs of the Trump Election Fraud Prosecution
In assessing the upsides and downsides of prosecuting Trump, one must think in terms of all plausible futures and counterfactuals. -
“He’s a Criminal Defendant”: A Protective Order Saga in the Trump Jan. 6 Case
A dispatch from Judge Tanya Chutkan’s courtroom -
Government Submits Reply in Support of Protective Order in Trump Jan. 6 Case
The defense counsel responded to the government’s proposed protective order by arguing it would infringe on Trump’s First Amendment rights.