The Week That Was: All of Lawfare In One Post
There is little sense in rounding up all of Lawfare-ers' Syria-related posts, as our fearless Managing Editor already did so.
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
There is little sense in rounding up all of Lawfare-ers' Syria-related posts, as our fearless Managing Editor already did so. But for convenience sake, here is a recap of the links anyway:
- Jack: British Bow Out of Syria Intervention, USG Plunging Ahead
- Wells: UK Parliament Votes Down British Military Action in Syria
- Bobby: The War Powers Resolution and Using Force in Syria
- Matt: Intervention to Stop Atrocities: Kosovo as Predictive
- Jack: Akande on the Legality of Humanitarian Intervention
- John: The UK Legal Position on Humanitarian Intervention in Syria: Kosovo Redux
- Jack: UK Legal Position on Humanitarian Intervention in Syria
- Rick: Creating New International Law “Justifications” for Using Military Force Against Syria
- Ben: Vacancies at the Top
- Jack: Hathaway and Shapiro on Syria and the U.N. Charter
- Wells: Letter From the Speaker of the House to POTUS Regarding Legal Justification for Action in Syria
- Jack: Why Doesn’t President Obama Seek Congressional Approval for Syria?
- Wells: Two Thoughts on Syria and Kosovo
- Jack: George Friedman on Obama’s Bluff
- Jack: Secretary of State Kerry on UNSCRs and Legality
- Jack: General Dempsey on Syria Intervention
- Rick: Kosovo, Syria: When it Comes to Military Force, What’s the Proper Relationship Between Law and Political Judgment?
- Jack: More on the Impact of Kosovo + Syria
- Ashley: The Value of Kosovo as a Non-Legal Precedent
- Jack: How Administration Lawyers Are Probably Thinking About the Constitutionality of the Syria Intervention (and a Note on the Domestic Political Dangers of Intervention)
- Jack: The Kosovo Precedent for Syria Isn’t Much of a Precedent
- Ashley: Arming Syrian Rebels: Lethal Assistance and International Law
- Ashley: Chemical Weapons and Syria: Enough to Justify the Use of Force?
- Introduction, by Ben
- Summary of the October 2011 FISC Opinion, written up by Ben and Lauren
- Summary of the November 2011 FISC Opinion, by Ben and Jane
- Summary of the September 2012 FISC Opinion, by Ben and Sean
- Summary of Statements to Congress, by Ben, Ritika and me
- Summary of the Minimization Procedures, by Ben and Sean
- Summary of the Compliance Report, by Jane
Raffaela Wakeman is a Senior Director at In-Q-Tel. She started her career at the Brookings Institution, where she spent five years conducting research on national security, election reform, and Congress. During this time she was also the Associate Editor of Lawfare. From there, Raffaela practiced law at the U.S. Department of Defense for four years, advising her clients on privacy and surveillance law, cybersecurity, and foreign liaison relationships. She departed DoD in 2019 to join the Majority Staff of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where she oversaw the Intelligence Community’s science and technology portfolios, cybersecurity, and surveillance activities. She left HPSCI in May 2021 to join IQT.
Raffaela received her BS and MS in Political Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2009 and her law degree from Georgetown University Law Center in 2015, where she was recognized for her commitment to public service with the Joyce Chiang Memorial Award. While at the Department of Defense, she was the inaugural recipient of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s General Counsel Award for exhibiting the highest standards of leadership, professional conduct, and integrity.