Latest in Highlights
Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With 
-
The Lawfare Podcast: Roger Parloff on the Oath Keeper Sentences
Thursday was sentencing day for some senior Oath Keepers. -
The FTC, Fertility App Premom, and Sharing Consumer Health Data
The FTC shows again that some companies widely share Americans’ health data—and Congress needs to do more. -
Open Questions, Legal Hurdles for Biden’s New Border Rule
The post-Title 42 rule aims to reduce asylum-seekers’ reliance on unauthorized entry but faces practical and legal hurdles. -
TikTok Sues State of Montana
After Montana’s governor codified a law banning the social media platform, TikTok is claiming that the bill was unconstitutional. -
U.S. and Partners Release Joint Cybersecurity Advisory on Volt Typhoon
The joint advisory warns of the tactics, techniques, and procedures used by a China state-sponsored cyber actor targeting U.S. critical infrastructure organizations. -
The Lawfare Podcast: Timothy McVeigh and the Rise of Right-Wing Extremism
Jack Goldsmith spoke to Jeffrey Toobin about his new book on the bombing and trial called, “Homegrown: Timothy McVeigh and the Rise of Right-Wing Extremism.” -
Rational Security: The 'Alan is One Year Closer to Death' Edition
This week, Alan, Quinta, and Scott were reunited to celebrate Alan's gradual physical and mental decline, and to talk over the week in national security news. -
U.S. Reliance on Chinese Drones: A Sector for the Next CHIPS Act?
Policymakers can strengthen both the ASDA and ICADA within a national security context, using the CHIPS Act as a model for the drone sector. -
The Case for a Deepfake Equities Process
The United States needs to create a government-wide process to carefully weigh if and when it would ever use deepfakes. -
The Lawfare Podcast: The Big Internet Case That Wasn't
The Supreme Court last week issued the biggest opinion in the history of the internet—except that it didn’t. -
For Better or Worse, the Supreme Court Rewrote JASTA
Twitter v. Taamneh alters the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act’s vague aiding and abetting standard but provides limited clarity. -
Supreme Court Grants Cert in Lindke and O’Connor-Ratcliff
The two cases involve the First Amendment implications of public officials blocking others on social media.
.jpg?sfvrsn=ea7a0c3_5)
.jpg?sfvrsn=24f646ff_5)
Topics
