Latest in Highlights
Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With 
-
The Imaginary Unitary Executive
Contrary to the “Decision of 1789” myth, history shows that the first Congress rejected the exclusive unitary model of the presidency—and thus the presidential removal power should be subject to more con... -
The End of the Open Skies Treaty and the Politics of Compliance
In a statement withdrawing from the treaty, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accused Russia of flagrantly violating its provisions. Were those allegations justified? If so, on what grounds? -
Afghanistan Between Negotiations: How the Doha Agreement Will Affect Intra-Afghan Peace
The Taliban left Doha with an advantage and is now raising the pressure on the Afghan government. -
The Week That Was: All of Lawfare in One Post
Your weekly summary of everything on the site. -
The Lawfare Podcast: David Shimer on 'Rigged'
-
Israel Reauthorizes Shin Bet’s Coronavirus Location Tracking
The Israeli government has reauthorized the General Security Agency to share metadata with the Ministry of Health for the purpose of combating the coronavirus. -
China Enacts Hong Kong Security Law; India Bans Dozens of Chinese Apps
Lawfare's biweekly roundup of U.S.-China technology policy and national security news. -
Today's Headlines and Commentary
Lawfare’s daily roundup of national security news and opinion. -
What’s New in the Unredacted Mueller Report?
BuzzFeed News successfully sued for the release of a version of the Mueller report with many fewer redactions. The unsealed material is a mixed bag of information that was already public and facts that a... -
Summer 2020 Supplement for 'Bradley, Deeks, & Goldsmith, Foreign Relations Law: Cases and Materials'
The Summer 2020 Supplement for Bradley, Deeks, & Goldsmith, Foreign Relations Law: Cases and Materials (7th ed. 2020) is now available on Lawfare. -
Thuraissigiam and the Future of the Suspension Clause
The Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam calls into question several aspects of the court’s earlier decision in Boumediene v. Bush and more generally signals a mor... -
The Supreme Court Rules Against Judicial Review of Expedited Removal
The decision carries implications for the rights of asylum-seekers facing expedited removal, the purpose of the writ of habeas corpus and the judiciary’s role in checking executive power.
Topics
