The Year in Review: L'Affaire Russe
2017 is coming to a close and what a year it has been for L’Affaire Russe. To help you reflect on the year that was, here’s our coverage of L’Affaire Russe over the past 12 months.
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
2017 is coming to a close and what a year it has been for L’Affaire Russe. To help you reflect on the year that was, here’s our coverage of L’Affaire Russe over the past 12 months.
We began the year with the Jan. 5 Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on cybersecurity threats and Russian hacking. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released its declassified report on “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections” the following day. Since then, there has been no shortage of developments. Here’s our commentary and analysis on Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. elections and the subsequent questions raised about the connections between members of the Trump campaign and Russian actors:
-
Why Are the Trump Allegations Hanging Around When They Haven’t Been Substantiated?
-
Takeaways from the House Intel Hearing on Russian “Active Measures”
-
I’m No Fan of RT, but I’m Even Less of a Fan of the Intelligence Community Playing Media Critic
-
To Understand Russian Interference, Start with this Movie About Doping
-
Addressing Russian Influence: What Can We Learn From U.S. Cold War Counter-Propaganda Efforts?
-
Washington Post Reports Jared Kushner Sought Secret Communications Channel with Kremlin
-
On the Back-Channel That Wasn’t and U.S. National Security Interests
-
Of Course There’s Evidence Trump Colluded with Russian Intelligence
-
Bombshell: Initial Thoughts on the Washington Post’s Game-Changing Story
-
Takeaways from Former CIA Director Brennan’s Testimony Today
-
How Much Do Americans Actually Care About the Russia Investigation?
-
Seven Theories of the Case: What Do We Really Know About L’Affaire Russe and What Could It All Mean?
Congress began sweeping investigations this year in both the House and Senate, in addition to the numerous hearings where officials testified concerning matters Russia-related.
-
What Do We Know About Investigations Into Trump’s Associates’ Ties to Russia?
-
Does Sessions Have to Recuse Himself on the Russia Investigation?
-
The Rules of Congressional Investigations and Trump’s Growing Problem
-
Strategy and Tactics for Investigating the Russia Connection
-
How Will We Know If the Russia-Trump Investigations by Congress and the FBI Are Credible?
-
It’s Time for a Select Committee on Russia (Also, We Told You So)
-
What the Heck Is Devin Nunes Talking About? A Guide for the Perplexed
-
House Intel Chair Devin Nunes Strikes Again: Tracking the Pattern
-
Let’s Talk About the House Intel Chairman Pointing a Finger at the FBI
-
Cautionary Notes on a Select Committee for the Russia Matter
-
Did the Justice Department Try to Keep Sally Yates from Testifying?
-
What Can Congress Do If Flynn (Or Anyone Else) Refuses to Comply With a Subpoena?
-
What Public Opinion of the Russia Investigation Reveals About Trust in Democratic Institutions
-
Highlights on the Russia Investigation from Today’s Senate Intelligence Committee Hearing
-
Your House Judiciary Committee Hard at Work with the People’s Business
-
There They Go Again: Your House Judiciary Committee Hard at Work, Part II
-
Ten Questions that the Senate Judiciary Committee Should Ask Jeff Sessions
-
Liveblog: Jeff Sessions Testifies Before Senate Intelligence Committee
Lawfare contributors walked us through the significance of relevant testimony from DOJ and FBI officials:
-
The Nightmare Scenario: Trump Fires Comey, the One Man Who Would Stand Up to Him
-
Takeaways from Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe’s Testimony Today
-
Another Bomb Drops: Initial Thoughts on Trump Asking Comey to Kill the Flynn Investigation
-
Did Comey “Grandstand” or “Politicize” the Russia Investigation?
-
Those “Three Separate Occasions”: What Comey Might Really Have Told Trump
-
Does the FBI Investigation Qualify Under the Obstruction of Justice Statutes? A Closer Look
-
Takeaways From Comey’s Prepared Testimony for the Senate Select Intelligence Committee
-
What Does Comey’s Statement Tell Us About Obstruction of Justice in the Flynn Investigation?
-
Liveblog: Former FBI Director James Comey Testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee
-
On the “Nature of the Person”: Initial Thoughts on James Comey’s Testimony
-
Only 17 Percent of Americans Believe Donald Trump is Telling the Truth About Comey
-
Congress Should Reconsider Giving the FBI Director Independence From Presidential Control
On May 17, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed Robert Mueller as special counsel to “oversee the previously-confirmed FBI investigation of Russian government efforts to influence the 2016 presidential elections and related matters.” Here’s our special counsel-related analysis:
-
Initial Reactions on the Appointment of Robert Mueller as Special Counsel
-
The Scope of the Mueller Probe: Will the Public Learn What Was Uncovered?
-
Counterintelligence Investigations and the Special Counsel’s Mandate: Part I
-
Counterintelligence Investigations and the Special Counsel’s Mandate: Part II
-
Trump’s Potential Interference with the Russia Investigation: What To Watch For
-
How to Read a News Story About an Investigation: Eight Tips on Who Is Saying What
-
Seven Frequently Asked Mueller Indictment Questions for Which We Don’t Have Answers
-
Summary: Papadopoulos Pleads Guilty to Making False Statements to the FBI
-
Summary: Manafort and Gates Indicted, Allegations and Charges
-
Robert Mueller’s Show of Strength: A Quick and Dirty Analysis
-
A Note of Caution for Robert Mueller: The Attacks on the Special Counsel Are Working
-
What Does the Manafort-Gates Indictment Mean for FARA Enforcement?
-
Flynn’s Plea and the Significance of Lying in the Russia Investigation
Here is Lawfare’s analysis of the events that precipitated Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn’s plea deal announced on Dec. 4:
-
Despite Denials, Michael Flynn Discussed Sanctions on Calls with Russian Ambassador
-
Why Michael Flynn’s Plan to Relax Russia Sanctions is Terrible Policy
-
The Treatment of Flynn’s Phone Calls Complies with FISA Minimization Procedures
-
General Flynn and the Privacy of U.S. Person Information Under FISA
-
Flynn, FISA, and FARA: On Foreign Principals and Agents of Foreign Power
-
Did Trump Tell Flynn to Talk to the Russian Ambassador - and Lie About It?
We have also commented on the role of the presidency and the meaning of executive privilege as investigations continued:
-
It’s Not a Post-Fact World Yet: Why Kompromat Can’t Touch Trump Yet
-
The President “Lawyers Up”: Constitutional Duty and Private Interest in the Trump Legal Defense
-
The President “Lawyers Up”: Constitutional Duty and Private Interest, Part II
-
Primer on Executive Privilege and the Executive Branch Approach to Congressional Oversight
-
Some Thoughts on the Coats-Roger Testimony and Executive Privilege
-
A Disabled Executive: The Special Counsel Investigation and Presidential Immunities
-
Trump’s Potential Interference with the Russia Investigation: What To Watch For
-
A “Beleaguered” Justice Department Under the Trump Presidency
L’Affaire Russe has raised questions independent of Russian interference, and we covered them here:
-
The Law of Lying: Perjury, False Statements, and Obstruction
-
The Latest Scoop from CNN and the New York Times: A Quick and Dirty Analysis
-
If the Government Surveilled Manafort, It Wasn’t About Politics
-
Alan Dershowitz’s Worries About the Russia Investigation and the Criminalization of Politics
-
Five Questions for Alan Dershowitz on the Criminalization of Political Differences